Atenção: Todas as denúncias são sigilosas e sua identidade será preservada.
Os campos nome e e-mail são de preenchimento opcional
Metadados | Descrição | Idioma |
---|---|---|
Autor(es): dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | - |
Autor(es): dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) | - |
Autor(es): dc.contributor | Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA) | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Tomacheuski, Rubia M. [UNESP] | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Taffarel, Marilda O. | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Ferrante, Marcos | - |
Autor(es): dc.creator | Luna, Stelio PL. [UNESP] | - |
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-22T00:31:40Z | - |
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available | 2022-02-22T00:31:40Z | - |
Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2020-12-11 | - |
Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2020-12-11 | - |
Data de envio: dc.date.issued | 2020-09-01 | - |
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2020.05.007 | - |
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200771 | - |
Fonte: dc.identifier.uri | http://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/200771 | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Objective: To investigate the current scenario in Brazil regarding pain assessment and control in experimental animals. Study design: Prospective survey. Methods: A confidential questionnaire was available online and sent by e-mail to Brazilian scientists working with animal experimentation in Brazil. Data collection was conducted from October 2016 to October 2017. The exclusion criteria included blank questionnaires or with <80% completed responses, researchers not performing experiments involving animals and foreign scientists. Results: A total of 96 questionnaires from 104 respondents were analyzed. The Fisher's exact test showed a disparity between the proportions of scientists who recognized the importance of analgesia and their application of analgesic techniques in painful procedures (p < 0.0003), and also for the researchers who assumed that experiments inflicted pain and their classification of the degree of invasiveness (p < 0.0001), indicating their insufficient knowledge of these topics. Overall, 77% of institutions did not offer specific training to assess pain in experimental animals, and 24% of respondents had no training to work with animal experimentation. In total, 62% of the studies inflicted pain, 48% of respondents used pain scales, and the drugs administered most frequently for pain management were morphine (44%), meloxicam (43%) and tramadol (37%); 15% of respondents did not include analgesics even though their studies inflicted pain. Commonly used animals were rats (33%), mice (29%) and rabbits (8%). Conclusions and clinical relevance: The results of this preliminary survey indicated that in Brazil there is a gap in the knowledge and training on pain assessment and management of experimental animals. Therefore, there is a necessity for an educational program to prepare and train scientists to assess and manage pain in laboratory or experimental animals. Further studies using a psychometrically validated survey instrument are warranted. | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Department of Anesthesiology Medical School (FMB) of São Paulo State University (UNESP) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Department of Veterinary Medicine Maringá State University (UEM) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Department of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Lavras (UFLA) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Department of Anesthesiology Medical School (FMB) of São Paulo State University (UNESP) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | Department of Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP) | - |
Descrição: dc.description | FAPESP: 2017/12815-0 | - |
Formato: dc.format | 647-656 | - |
Idioma: dc.language | en | - |
Relação: dc.relation | Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia | - |
???dc.source???: dc.source | Scopus | - |
Palavras-chave: dc.subject | analgesia | - |
Palavras-chave: dc.subject | analgesics | - |
Palavras-chave: dc.subject | laboratory animals | - |
Palavras-chave: dc.subject | pain measurement | - |
Palavras-chave: dc.subject | rats | - |
Palavras-chave: dc.subject | survey | - |
Título: dc.title | Preliminary survey of the attitudes of Brazilian scientists towards pain management and assessment in animals used in science | - |
Tipo de arquivo: dc.type | livro digital | - |
Aparece nas coleções: | Repositório Institucional - Unesp |
O Portal eduCAPES é oferecido ao usuário, condicionado à aceitação dos termos, condições e avisos contidos aqui e sem modificações. A CAPES poderá modificar o conteúdo ou formato deste site ou acabar com a sua operação ou suas ferramentas a seu critério único e sem aviso prévio. Ao acessar este portal, você, usuário pessoa física ou jurídica, se declara compreender e aceitar as condições aqui estabelecidas, da seguinte forma: