Functional Resistance Training Superiority Over Conventional Training in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversity of Brasilia-
Autor(es): dc.contributorHasselt University-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)-
Autor(es): dc.contributorOxford Brookes University-
Autor(es): dc.creatorTurri-Silva, Natália-
Autor(es): dc.creatorRicci-Vitor, Ana Laura [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorCipriano Jr, Gerson-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGarner, David-
Autor(es): dc.creatorNetto, Jaime [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorGiacon, Thaís [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDestro Christofaro, Diego Giulliano [UNESP]-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMarques Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T00:24:37Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2022-02-22T00:24:37Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2020-07-02-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1679333-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198461-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/198461-
Descrição: dc.descriptionMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a growing epidemic related with higher values of blood pressure (BP) and autonomic dysfunction. Scientific evidence has been indicating that functional resistance training (FRT) is superior over conventional (CRT) for muscle fatigue and pain, yet its effects on autonomic modulation (AM), BP and heart rate in MetS are unclear. We theorized that FRT can be superior to CRT in MetS patients because of larger muscle activation. This study compares FRT and CRT on AM, blood pressure, heart rate and muscle strength. Thirty-eight sex and age matched individuals (40 to 60 years) were randomized for FRT or CRT, with training intensity varying gradually from 30%–100% of one maximal repetition test (1MR), 3 times/week for 30 sessions. All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and post training. AM was assessed by heart rate variability (mean RR, RMSSD, SDNN, LF, HF, TINN, RRtri, SD1 and SD2). BP (mmHg) was obtained by cuff measures. Muscle strength was assessed by 1MR. An increase in cardiac parasympathetic activity was observed in individuals allocated to FRT in comparison to CRT group (RMSSD ∆40%; SD1 ∆39%; and HF ms2 ∆80%). Moreover, just FRT was capable of reducing BP post intervention (SBP from 129.21 ± 19.02 to 118.94 ± 14.14 mmHg, p < .009,/d/ = 0.49; DBP from 85.26 ± 11.48 to 77.76 ± 8.93 mmHg, p < .01,/d/ = 0.51). Both groups had a similar increase in muscle strength and no changes between HR. Progressive FRT was more beneficial to CRT regarding AM, increasing vagal activity, and reducing blood pressure in MetS individuals.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionUniversity of Brasilia-
Descrição: dc.descriptionHasselt University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSão Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionOxford Brookes University-
Descrição: dc.descriptionSão Paulo State University (UNESP)-
Formato: dc.format415-424-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport-
???dc.source???: dc.sourceScopus-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectautonomic modulation-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectblood pressure-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectexercise therapy-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMetabolic syndrome-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectresistance training-
Título: dc.titleFunctional Resistance Training Superiority Over Conventional Training in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.