Acute LED irradiation does not change the anaerobic capacity and time to exhaustion during a high-intensity running effort: a double-blind, crossover, and placebo-controlled study: Effects of LED irradiation on anaerobic capacity and performance in running

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMalta, Elvis De Souza-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDe Poli, Rodrigo Araujo Bonetti-
Autor(es): dc.creatorBrisola, Gabriel Motta Pinheiro-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMilioni, Fabio-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMiyagi, Willian Eiji-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMachado, Fabiana Andrade-
Autor(es): dc.creatorZagatto, Alessandro Moura-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T00:30:14Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2021-03-11T00:30:14Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2018-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2018-12-11-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2016-09-01-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2011-y-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/168801-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/11449/168801-
Descrição: dc.descriptionThe purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of photobiomodulation therapy using cluster light-emitting diodes (LEDT; 104 diodes) (wavelength 660 and 850 nm; energy density 1.5 and 4.5 J/cm2; energy 60 J at each point; total energy delivered 600 J) on alternative maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAODALT) and time to exhaustion, during a high-intensity running effort. Fifteen moderately active and healthy males (age 25.1 ± 4.4 years) underwent a graded exercise test and two supramaximal exhaustive efforts at 115 % of the intensity associated with maximal oxygen uptake performed after acute LEDT or placebo irradiation in a double-blind, crossover, and placebo-controlled study design. The MAODALT was assumed as the sum of both oxygen equivalents estimated from the glycolytic and phosphagen metabolism pathways during each supramaximal effort. For the statistical analysis, a paired t test was used to determine differences between the treatments. The significance level was assumed as 95 %. In addition, a qualitative analysis was used to determine the magnitude of differences between groups. No significant differences were found for the values of oxygen equivalents from each energetic metabolism (P ≥ 0.28), for MAODALT values between the LEDT and placebo conditions (P ≥ 0.27), or for time to exhaustion (P = 0.80), except for the respiratory exchange ratio (P = 0.01). The magnitude-based inference of effect size reported only a possibly negative effect of photobiomodulation on MAODALT when expressed in units relative to body mass and on the glycolysis pathway (26 %). In summary, LEDT after a high-intensity running effort did not alter the MAODALT, metabolic energy pathways, or high-intensity running performance.-
Formato: dc.format1473-1480-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Relação: dc.relationLasers in Medical Science-
Relação: dc.relation0,713-
Direitos: dc.rightsopenAccess-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectAnaerobic capacity-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectLED therapy-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectMaximal accumulated oxygen deficit-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectPhotobiomodulation therapy-
Título: dc.titleAcute LED irradiation does not change the anaerobic capacity and time to exhaustion during a high-intensity running effort: a double-blind, crossover, and placebo-controlled study: Effects of LED irradiation on anaerobic capacity and performance in running-
Tipo de arquivo: dc.typelivro digital-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional - Unesp

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.