Quality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method

Registro completo de metadados
MetadadosDescriçãoIdioma
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de Brasília-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de Brasília-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de Brasília-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Alfenas-
Autor(es): dc.contributorUniversidade de Brasília-
Autor(es): dc.creatorVaz, Juliana Maria de Albuquerque-
Autor(es): dc.creatorAlves, Bárbara Manuella Cardoso Sodré-
Autor(es): dc.creatorDuarte, Djane B.-
Autor(es): dc.creatorMarques, Luciene Alves Moreira-
Autor(es): dc.creatorSantana, Rafael Santos-
Data de aceite: dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T12:21:34Z-
Data de disponibilização: dc.date.available2024-07-22T12:21:34Z-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2024-07-09-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2024-07-09-
Data de envio: dc.date.issued2022-03-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttp://repositorio2.unb.br/jspui/handle/10482/48630-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211037297-
Fonte completa do material: dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-2837-
Fonte: dc.identifier.urihttp://educapes.capes.gov.br/handle/capes/801949-
Descrição: dc.descriptionObjective: To evaluate the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines for headache management and their main recommendations. Background: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been developed to support the clinical decision-making. However, to achieve this goal, the quality of these guidelines must be ensured. Methods: A systematic search for clinical practice guidelines for headache management was conducted in the PubMed database, in websites of known guideline developers and in websites of known headache associations. The quality appraisal was performed through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II method. Results: Twelve guidelines were evaluated. The domains of rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence, which most influence the overall quality of guidelines, had the lowest average scores and the highest standard deviation rates (61% 23; 37% 20; 53% 31). The main recommendations regarding medication use for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache and migraine in adult patients consisted of paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in all guidelines. Conclusions: The statistical results indicate that the appraised guidelines have room for both individual and collective improvement. In addition, there is a well-established medication recommendation pattern among all guidelines evaluated.-
Descrição: dc.descriptionFaculdade de Ciências da Saúde (FS)-
Descrição: dc.descriptionDepartamento de Farmácia (FS FAR)-
Idioma: dc.languageen-
Publicador: dc.publisherSAGE Publications-
Relação: dc.relationhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03331024211037297-
Direitos: dc.rightsAcesso Aberto-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDor de cabeça-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectCuidados de saúde baseados em evidências-
Palavras-chave: dc.subjectDiretrizes clínicas-
Título: dc.titleQuality appraisal of existing guidelines for the management of headache disorders by the AGREE II’s method-
Aparece nas coleções:Repositório Institucional – UNB

Não existem arquivos associados a este item.